Xity
XityChain

Consensus, explained publicly

What you need to understand about how the chain agrees We explain the model in full We do not publish the operational internals that would help an attacker

Public explanation · operational details are restricted

Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance

XityChain uses Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) PBFT produces deterministic finality: once a block is committed it cannot be reverted, and the protocol tolerates up to one-third Byzantine validators

The three phases

  1. Pre-prepare (leader proposes)
  2. Prepare (validators acknowledge)
  3. Commit (final, irreversible)

Safety under fault

PBFT requires a quorum of two-thirds of validators to commit a block This is the mathematical safety guarantee under up to one-third faulty validators

Current operating mode

The development chain uses one authority as proposer Distributed validator consensus is not active, and a fixed confirmation time is not guaranteed

We explain what the consensus achieves, not how to break it The view-change logic, the leader-selection details, and the failover procedures are operational and therefore classified
What we publish
Public
Model and guarantees
PBFT, three-phase commit, quorum rule, current mode
What we summarise
Partial
Validator transition plan
Multi-validator council operation is on the roadmap at a high level
What we restrict
Restricted
Operational internals
Failover, leader-selection detail, topology, attack surface
On the roadmap

A council of validators, in time

Single-validator operation is the honest current mode Transition to a council of independent validators is designed, under review, and on the public roadmap

Secure connection · Official site of XityOfficial domain · xity.city
XityChain: Block 8Last checked 2026-11-11 23:06:33 UTCStatus